Even after 33 years, the originalism of Varanasi’s most famous Gyanvapi case is moving forward with hindrances. After testimony and cross-examination in the original case, now the petitions filed for the parties are becoming the cause of delay. First, the family members of Harihar Pandey filed an appeal to become the plaintiff, which was rejected by the Corps.
.
The hearing of the original 1991 Lord Visvesvarnath case is going on in the court of Civil Judge Senior Division Yugal Shambhu (Fast Track Court). The judge is now hearing the case, in which the amicus curiae has filed his objection, denying the propriety of the petitioner becoming an amicus curiae. The judge will hear the side of the petitioner and the defendant today.
In the original theory of Gyanvapi complex, this place has been claimed to be a temple.
Hearing will be held in the court of Civil Judge Senior Division (Fast Track) Yugal Shambhu on Tuesday afternoon in the ancient Swayambhu Lord Adivishveshwar case of the year 1991. In this case, after 33 years, the High Court has given guidelines for judgment as soon as possible.
On the last date of hearing of the case, litigant Vijay Shankar Rastogi had completed the arguments on his petition related to getting survey done by ASI in Gyanvapi complex. The defendant Anjuman Intejamia Masajid Committee has to present its stand.
On the other hand, the plaintiff in this ancient case was Somnath Vyas, after his death, nephew Yogendranath Vyas has also applied to become a party. On the previous date itself, lawyer Vijay Shankar Rastogi had opposed it. An objection was filed in the court against the application. Now Yogendranath Vyas has filed a counter objection against the objection of litigation friend Vijay Shankar Rastogi.
At the same time, Yogendra Nath Vyas said that Vyas has had the right to worship the Gods and Goddesses in the Gyanvapi complex for generations. Therefore, he has the right to become a party in this case. The court will take a decision on this after the hearing. For which today both the parties and people associated with the case including the petitioner have been summoned.
Harihar Pandey’s sons’ petition has been rejected
Let us tell you that in the last months, after the death of Harihar Pandey, the Senior Division Fast Track Court had rejected the application of making his sons a party. A monitoring petition was filed against this decision in the court of the District Judge, after hearing which, he ruled that he should not be made the successor in the case.
The Court of Additional District Judge Goods and Act clarified that this suit is not one of succession, in the nature of the case the plaintiff does not have a personal position to be made his successor plaintiff. The Mulavad Lord Vishweshwar Nath case of 1991 is a different type of case. Therefore, Harihar Pandey’s sons Pranay Pandey and Karan Shankar Pandey cannot be made parties.
